Shane van Gisbergen’s transition from Australian Supercars to NASCAR has been a hot topic, and his recent comments have stirred even more discussion. The three-time Supercars champion has been vocal about the differences between racing in Australia and the U.S., suggesting that if Denny Hamlin were in Australia, he wouldn’t last long. But why does he think that, and what does it say about the shift he’s experienced?
Van Gisbergen’s remark reflects the stark contrast in racing cultures. In Supercars, aggressive moves and controversial racecraft are met with harsh penalties, while in NASCAR, rubbing fenders and pushing limits are part of the show. Hamlin, known for his no-nonsense approach and willingness to make bold moves, might find himself in constant trouble under the stricter Australian regulations.
Since moving to the U.S., van Gisbergen has had to adapt quickly. The more contact-heavy, strategic nature of NASCAR racing means he’s had to adjust his style to survive in a world where drivers often settle their differences on the track rather than in the rulebook. His success in Chicago’s street race showed he has what it takes, but he’s also had to acknowledge the steep learning curve.
But could Hamlin succeed in Australia? Given his skill and experience, there’s reason to believe he could. While he’s used to the rough-and-tumble nature of NASCAR, Hamlin’s precision driving and ability to manage long races would translate well to Supercars. His adaptability has been a defining trait, and if he committed to the change, he could thrive. However, he’d likely need to tone down his aggressive tactics to stay out of trouble.
Van Gisbergen’s perspective offers a unique look at how different the two racing worlds really are. While Hamlin might struggle with Australia’s stricter approach to racecraft, there’s little doubt he has the talent to perform. But whether he’d be willing to adjust his style is another question entirely.
